Skills Intelligence Platform

/24

Ceciilia Silvano

about

Building the foundation of an AI-powered skills-based Workforce Planning Platform for enterprise HR teams.

5 months

From concept to first sale

5 months

From concept to first sale

$1M

In sales pipeline within 6 months

$1M

In sales pipeline within 6 months

0 to core

Became key in Beamery's value proposition before end of year

0 to core

Became key in Beamery's value proposition before end of year

  • Senior Product Designer

  • Beamery

  • 2024

Senior Product Designer

Beamery

2024

the challenge

The labor market moves faster than HR teams can keep up

We all know how fast the labor market is evolving today: new roles emerge and skills become obsolete faster than ever. For enterprise HR teams managing hundreds of roles across distributed offices, this creates an impossible coordination problem.

The consequences are expensive: losing talent due to unclear expectations, hiring for the wrong skills, and missing critical capability gaps until it's too late.

research

From vision to action

The workforce management platform had been discussed by leadership but never formally documented. We consolidated scattered information through stakeholder sessions (CPO, CEO, Product Directors, Recruiting Strategists), past HR executive interviews, and competitor analysis.

Key insights

User needs

  • Data centralization across fragmented systems

  • Cross-team collaboration at scale (tools like Google Sheets couldn't support enterprise workflows)

  • Guidance and automation to free HR teams for strategic work

Business opportunity

  • Capture revenue by addressing critical market demand

  • Boost net retention through continuous customer value

  • Enhance existing tools with integrated, skills-based solutions

Market gap

  • 84% of leaders prioritize skills-first approaches

  • Competitors lack solid internal and market data integrations for strategic planning

Target users

We designed for three interconnected roles with different needs: C-suite strategists, People Managers coordinating cross-regional reviews, and line managers defining team requirements. The MVP focused on the latter two since they do the hands-on work.

Planning

Pillars of a skills intelligence platform

Job Architecture

The foundation. A structural framework that works as the single source of truth for understanding and managing organizational skills and the organizational blueprint for workforce planning.

Planning & Forecasting

Helping executives anticipate workforce needs and make proactive decisions.

Insights Dashboard

Combining internal talent data, candidate pipelines, and market intelligence for real-time strategic insights.

POC: Validating the foundation

We chose to start with Job Architecture deliberately. You can't build meaningful insights or forecasting without an accurate foundation and unreliable data.

We focused on validating that foundation through a proof of concept. Our goal: get Job Architecture right, prove people will use it, then expand.

Learnings

Intuitive or invisible

Line managers don't prioritize maintaining job architectures. The experience had to be self-explanatory with zero barriers to entry.

Guidance at a scale

Managing hundreds of roles manually is impossible. Users needed the system to flag issues, suggest priorities, and automate grunt work.

Transparency to build trust

Changes to job architecture directly impact hiring, development, and workforce strategy. Users needed complete visibility into where data came from and who approved what.

solution

Approach

Before jumping into solutions, we mapped the entire user journey across three key phases: Creation, Review, and Maintenance. This helped us identify where AI could accelerate work and where human judgment was critical.

We focused t he MVP on stages 2-4, validating the core review and approval workflow before building advanced maintenance features.

AI capabilities & human control

We used AI to handle the complexity of normalizing thousands of skills across different naming conventions, while keeping humans in control of decisions that affect their entire workforce.

What AI did

  • Skills normalization and classification across company terminology

  • Intelligent skill suggestions based on role context and industry patterns

  • Duplicate detection to reduce taxonomy redundancy

Where Humans controlled

  • Review and approval required for all AI suggestions

  • Override capability at any point in the workflow

  • Sign-off workflows for changes impacting workforce strategy

Making the invisible visible

After setup, the dashboard became the central hub that gave admins immediate visibility into their entire skills landscape.

Composition & Health tracks scope and review status across all roles and job families, and Skills Management shows how skills were identified, showing where AI added value versus human input.

This transparency helped teams prioritize reviews and validate the AI's work.

Reviewing AI suggestions

Collaborators review AI-suggested skills for each role. They see definitions, naming variations, and the data source. Users approve accurate skills or flag incorrect ones. Source transparency was a non-negotiable to build trust in the system.

Managing roles at a scale

The full skills view shows how AI provides market intelligence while humans retain control. Trend indicators flag skills that are sunsetting, trending, or emerging based on market data, but users decide whether or not to update the skills base.

Adding skills

When adding skills, AI suggests matches from the unified taxonomy and shows naming variations automatically, eliminating duplicate entries, and users make the final call on proficiency.

impact

Key metrics

  • 5 months from idea to first sale, first user live within 7 months.

  • $1M in sales pipeline within 6 months.

  • Became core part of Beamery's value proposition.

  • Positive feedback from beta users, reporting better collaboration and alignment across distributed teams.

Learning and iteration

We measured Task Success Rate for manual tasks like adding skills, and 79% showed we got the fundamentals right. Most errors came from users not understanding skill normalization at first, which we addressed in later iterations.

We also saw AI hallucinations in generated descriptions and occasional misclassifications early on. The ML team addressed these quickly, and our transparent sourcing meant users could catch and flag issues immediately. This actually built trust rather than breaking it.

Personal development

This project was my first 0-to-1 initiative. It sharpened my ability to navigate ambiguity, make strategic decisions in a very fast-paced environment, and align the needs of diverse stakeholders.

The biggest challenge was moving forward confidently when nothing was defined. I learned to make reversible decisions fast, validate assumptions continuously, and ship to learn rather than ship to finish.